download the movie Warfare Historians Rate 51 Military Battles In Movies And TV | How Real Is It? | Insider for free online in high quality
download the movie Warfare Historians Rate 51 Military Battles In Movies And TV | How Real Is It? | Insider for free online in high quality
cool
First to say "first" ??
Meticulous craftsmanship at its finest; each frame is a canvas painted with precision.?
Its "Willy Nilly" not "Nilly Willy".
I don't know why but this is giving me the exact vibe of talking to redditor fr
Reupload??
? what are you on about ? The Russians are using meat waves in the Ukraine the same as they DID in ww2. The Russians have crews shooting those that retreat the same as they DID in ww2 ?
I couldn’t keep watching past the first guy at all. Seriously doesn’t have a clue what he is talking about at all. So can’t take this whole video serious at all. Dude a joke.
Love how the airman is issuing ratings with fractions; double that degree of precision! All those math classes left a mark on his soul.
Really like hearing the analysis from experts who know what they are talking about. Thank you.
(D-day) Why did they streatch out over such a far area? only think i can think of is stagnation, but why not fokus on one section and send more waves and artillary. If they notice another opening have a second wave go there.
Where's the ditch?
@6:40 Russia still do this on a large scale in Ukraine.
Well on the mg42 you can use long rates of fire. You replace the barrel after 2-300 rounds. Takes about 3 sec to replace it and let it cool down
The cool thing is the ENTIRE movie of Dunkirk is happening at the same time. We just cut to different points in the story in different times of the event.
In the saving private Ryan movie it does show them using Bangalore torpedo explosives to destroy a section of wire to allow troops through.
I was really looking forward to the SPR critique. But, alas, another "historian" that has apparently avoided reading the Army's own critique of itself available on the US Army Center for Military History website. Very little that he said was accurate starting with the depth of the tidal flat. It was not 100 to 200 yards deep. The tidal range is 18' and the low tide tidal flat for the first wave was in the range of 325 ± 25 yards. Of the men unlucky enough to be landed opposite Vierville (the farthest west of all the draws leading off the beach) 50% were killed long before reaching the beach and the other 50% discarded their equipment and pretended to be dead, creeping in with the advancing tide and eastward with the current. The Army itself admitted that due to the wholly ineffective bombing plan 100% of the first wave landed opposite Vierville was rendered ineffective.
He also committed the unforgivable error of not stating that Omaha was approximately 5 miles wide. Due to the lousy overcast weather and the strong west to east tide many of the men were fortunate in that they were landed between draws (all of which were fortified with concrete bunkers) rather than their assigned points directly opposite the other draws. This is the only reason the first wave Vierville massacre was not repeated at the other draws and directly led to the three points that the soldiers got off the beach by ascending the 60 – 90 foot non-rocky bluffs that front the Omaha beach between the draws.
The presence of a Ranger captain at any draw is inaccurate. Those Rangers were to be reinforcements for Col Rudder at Point du Hoc but because all of Rudder's radios were rendered inoperative command deduced that the Point du Hoc mission had failed. The Ranger reinforcements were redirected to Vierville but the Ranger officer in command determined that everyone that had landed at Vierville were dead so they headed west away from Vierville in an attempt to flank Vierville. Ummm… About 500 yards? The dirt bluffs had given way to the more usual rocky type. They climbed the rock face using bayonets for pitons. The Rangers then spent the entire day in a firefight at the Stone House west of Vierville.
I give SPR a 10 for special effects and a zero for historical accuracy.
Pretty refreshing to see a historian debunk those ridiculous cliches of the Soviet Union's "human waves" etc very embarrassing to see how many easily embrace lies because of ideological reasons.
The first guy faults Fury for not having the American tanks spread around the enemy and with one going in the middle, but a later scene when they face the large German tank they use exactly the strategy he was describing.
Russians wouldn't use blocking units like that….fast forward to today and once again they are using blocking units as described in the movie…….
…))))My Lord J.ESUS Christ Returns, repent of sin and OBEY the LAW of the Father… Y..A,,H.. is a egipt DEMON, BEWARE … (HalleluJAH is a PAGAN word)))
Really liked the 3rd history nerd (glasses brit guy) on the show. His charisma is and a bit of sacism really made him stand out and you can listern to him nerding and flaming stuff done wrong in movies all day.
I hope Insider invites a Napoleonic War expert to review Ridley Scott's Napoleon.
I'm glad he mentioned Robin Olds Gliding kill with his P38 Lightning during his Europet theatre